A Night at the Federal Budgetary Opera

The Grand Federal Budget Opera has a bigger cast but none of the pizzazz of “Aida.” Cincinnati Opera’s 2007 production of Giuseppe Verdi’s “Aida.” The Grand Federal Budget Opera has a bigger cast but none of the pizzazz of “Aida.” Cincinnati Opera’s 2007 production of Giuseppe Verdi’s “Aida.” Photo credit: Cincinnati Opera/Philip Groshong

We have not seen a "normal" federal budget process in Washington in years. Instead we have substituted what could be the perfect libretto for a grand opera featuring tenors, baritones and sopranos, singing arias of high drama that soar through crisis after crisis with last second rescues, magic “continuing” resolutions that last forever, and a “curse” in which the federal government is doomed to wander from one near shutdown to the next. One element in this libretto that had not changed until this year was the timing of the President’s budget, which even in these normal/abnormal times was presented to Congress the first week of February.  The presidential budget is considered the statement of the Executive Branch about where it will put emphasis in the upcoming year. The President’s budget is known inside the Beltway as dead on arrival, since Congress is quick to remind the President of the United States that the Legislative Branch, not the President, holds the purse strings. Members of Congress have started orchestrating their own budget, returned to their own priorities, and featuring an entertaining legislative minuet.

This year, the budget opera is odder and, potentially, more dramatic. The President’s budget was released very late—April 10—after Congress had already started on its own version, so that  the President’s budget this year may have been dead on departure.  In fact, both the House and the Senate had already passed their budget resolutions, which are priority statements to guide appropriators in writing spending bills.

Yet the President’s budget is always important because it gives a sense of where the Administration is putting the accent for spending. This year the Administration showed its enthusiasm for science, well before the curtain went up on the budget opera. In a memorable speech1,, the President announced a new project, the BRAIN (Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies) Initiative, with the goal of mapping the human brain to find cures for devastating neurological and psychiatric diseases. I thought it was wonderful to hear the President speaking of basic neuroscience research as a top national priority during hard financial times, even when there were so many other thorny national needs that he could have singled out. The verdict on the BRAIN project, though, is still out since we know very little about the details, and most of all, the details surrounding the project’s feasibility and timeline. In addition, the rhetorical parallels with the human genome project did not seem very accurate. At any rate, it was very energizing to see science getting so much attention from the White House a week before the budget announcement.

Once the curtain went up on the President’s budget, I noted the accent on science, which I applauded. The President proposes an increase of $470 million for NIH from fiscal year 2012. The NSF sees a significant increase of $593 million as a commitment to strengthen R&D, following the “America Competes Act” and also the R&D portion of the Department of Energy budget, which would be strengthened along with those of several other science agencies.

I am not a budget analyst but I have followed the federal budget process for several years. Once the budget overture was played, I quietly started my back of the envelope calculations to understand what these numbers in the proposed budget mean.

I was surprised to see that numbers in the President’s budget do not take into consideration the sequestration cuts, which are now written into law.  So, unfortunately I needed to subtract sequestration cuts from the numbers announced. Once I’d done this, my calculations showed significant reductions to the NIH budget, not increases. There is no new money.

Here is my math for the NIH figures. In 2012, the NIH received a budget authority for $30.8 billion, which was then cut by $1.5 billion in March of 2013 because of the infamous sequestration, leaving the NIH budget at $29.3 billion. Now, the President’s budget proposes an increase of $470 million for 2014, which in part offsets sequestrations (great thing to do), but unfortunately not completely, leaving the proposed 2014 budget for NIH at $29.8 billion, or ~$1 billion less than 2012. In other words, our scientific community depending on NIH grants will have ~$1 billion less in 2014 than in 2012, according to budget figures that include sequestration. What the Administration is proposing in its budget is essentially a mitigation of sequestration, according to its priorities. Science fortunately has a high priority there but we are still deep in the red when other countries are instead buttressing their investments in research.

It is harder to work out calculations that include sequestration for each NIH Institute since the information of how these are applied within the different NIH components was not made public. The White House says that these figures will be available in a month. However, you can see the numbers in the budget (sans sequestration computed) for each NIH Institute and Center in the table which I report here (See Figure 1 below) that comes from the President’s Budget. You may notice reductions to NIGMS, which could be because of cuts to the Center Grants Program but they may show a notable $38 million increase for R01s. Also, there seems to be an increase for the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of ~$90 million from 2012. Remember, no sequestration is computed in these numbers; we’ll see in a month how sequestration is applied to the different NIH components.

These are the numbers for the President’s budget request but they can change for a wide variety of reasons, because of incoming transfers from other parts of the federal budget, or for transfer to other parts of the federal budget authorities. Since the NIH is one of the largest budgets within the Labor-HHS bill, it will be important to watch carefully for transfers, which could hurt the pool of money set aside for biomedical research, if other priorities emerge.

So, is this budget good new news or bad news? I think it is good news that the President's budget made the effort to communicate science as a priority, especially for biomedical research. Unfortunately, the numbers because of sequestration only marginally offset the damage inflicted by this horrendous piece of legislation, which was never designed to come into effect.

BUDGET-2014-APP-1-10 Details-20 (Click to Enlarge)
Figure 1— Distribution of Budget Authority and Outlays by
Account, page 436, FY14, Budget of U.S. Government,
for full citation, see Note 3.
We need to keep up our strong advocacy activities at ASCB, under the leadership of Doug Koshland and our indefatigable policy wonk Kevin Wilson. We need to work to repeal sequestration in research budgets so that we can stop eating our seed corn while throwing away 5%—the value of NIH sequestration—of those seeds. Innovation is the way out of the financial hole, not lack thereof. Let's roll up our sleeves and work together, after all in life, as in opera: It ain't over until the fat lady sings! The voice of science cannot afford to be drowned out in these discordant times.

  1. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/02/remarks-president-brain-initiative-and-american-innovation
  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJuxLDRsSQc&feature=youtu.be
  3. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=BUDGET&browsePath=Fiscal+Year+2014&searchPath=Fiscal+Year+2014&leafLevelBrowse=false&isCollapsed=false&isOpen=true&packageid=BUDGET-2014-FCS&ycord=1565
Stefano Bertuzzi

Dr. Stefano Bertuzzi is the Executive Director of the American Society for Cell Biology. In this position he is responsible, with the ASCB Board, for strategic planning and all operations at the Society to serve the needs of its ~9,000 members and to promote the field of cellular biology and basic science.

Email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Most Recent Articles *

To read the full article, click on the READ MORE button below.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Prev Next
ASCB Kaluza Prize Reflects ASCB’s Concern that Young Scientists Are Now a Vulnerable Population

ASCB Kaluza Prize Reflects ASCB’s Concern that Young Scientists Are Now a Vulnerable Population

The ASCB Kaluza Prize recognizes significant research achievement by early career scientists who still pursue excellence amidst economic uncertainties and political shortsightedness. ASCB Photo.In the...

11-20-2013

Read more
Round Trip from Stockholm to ASCB

Round Trip from Stockholm to ASCB

With Stockholm still in the future, Randy Schekman (third from left) with fellow 2013 Nobel winner, Jim Rothman (far right), shared the ASCB's highest scientific honor, the E. B. Wilson Medal, with St...

11-06-2013

Read more
Colliding Worlds—A Rare Visit to the CERN Collider Gives a Biologist New Hope

Colliding Worlds—A Rare Visit to the CERN Collider Gives a Biologist New Hope

Nearly 170 meters beneath CERN, ASCB Executive Director Stefano Bertuzzi gets a rare look at the Large Hadron Collider. Here he stands in front of the detector. Photo Credit: ASCBLast week, I was invi...

10-23-2013

Read more
Watching Train Wrecks

Watching Train Wrecks

It’s full steam ahead for disaster or will the brakes stop the runaway fiscal crisis train in time? Photo by John FleischmanAlong with the future of U.S. research science, the train wreck metaphor has...

10-16-2013

Read more
UPDATED-NIH Furloughs to Widen—From Slowdown to Shutdown, U.S. Science Takes a Hit

UPDATED-NIH Furloughs to Widen—From Slowdown to Shutdown, U.S. Science Takes a Hit

The USDA is closed and no U.S. orders for international fruit flies can be processed until the government is back in business.Photo Credit: André KarwathUUPDATED—The "Activation Energy" blog has learn...

10-09-2013

Read more
Shutting Down Basic Science—Some Thoughts at Midnight (no, this is not a fairy tale)

Shutting Down Basic Science—Some Thoughts at Midnight (no, this is not a fairy tale)

Last night at midnight, the government ran out of money and shut down its main operations. Sadly, it left me wondering if perhaps our democracy ran out of steam as well. I've tried to explain what is ...

10-01-2013

Read more
New Partners and New Ventures for ASCB in Science Education Reform

New Partners and New Ventures for ASCB in Science Education Reform

In a 2012 Science editorial, Bruce Alberts, a former ASCB president who was then the journal's editor, urged professional societies to team up in leading innovation in science education. ASC...

09-25-2013

Read more
The Scholarly Paper That No One Will Want to Read Is Being Written in Congress

The Scholarly Paper That No One Will Want to Read Is Being Written in Congress

Spelling It Out: Spending on basic research has increased our longevity and the quality of that longer life. Photo Credit: John FleischmanThis week, a paper in the American Journal of Public Health, a...

09-18-2013

Read more
A Scientist-Senator with a Seat — and a Vote — for Life

A Scientist-Senator with a Seat — and a Vote — for Life

I recently spent some time on a family vacation in Italy. We have a tradition in our family; at the dinner table, each of us has to say the best and the worst thing that happened to him or her during ...

09-10-2013

Read more
Showing the Faces of Science

Showing the Faces of Science

In 2011, the Nobel Foundation awarded its prize of prizes to cell biologist, immunologist, and longtime ASCB member Ralph Steinman. When the foundation tried calling to deliver the good news, no one p...

09-05-2013

Read more
Lessons from a Society of Societies

Lessons from a Society of Societies

This week, ASCB went to ASAE, or rather five ASCB staffers and yours truly attended a meeting of the ASAE in Atlanta. ASCB, I trust you know, stands for the American Society for Cell Biology. The ASAE...

08-07-2013

Read more
Why Congress Should Be Worried About the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Why Congress Should Be Worried About the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Morphogenesis in biology always fascinated me. As a developmental neurobiologist at the bench, I studied how homeobox genes patterned the neural epithelium, the retina in particular, to understand the...

07-30-2013

Read more