Shutting Down Basic Science—Some Thoughts at Midnight (no, this is not a fairy tale)

time running outLast night at midnight, the government ran out of money and shut down its main operations. Sadly, it left me wondering if perhaps our democracy ran out of steam as well. I've tried to explain what is happening to foreign friends but I am not sure that anyone grasps the logic here, perhaps because there is no logic.


As a former federal employee myself, I am trying to figure out what is happening to vital services and old friends. As the Executive Director of ASCB, I can't believe this is happening to so many hard-working ASCB members who are directly employed by the federal government. Of course, if this drags on, the shutdown will spread its impact to research scientists nationwide.

The truth is that in basic science we are all government workers, whatever our paycheck says in the upper left hand corner. As I mentioned in my previous blog, the government is the one actor who cares for the public good. In basic bioscience, we are all trying to build lighthouses that light the way to better lives for future generations. If the government does not build lighthouses, no one will. Basic research is the quintessential public good. No private foundation or corporation alone could finance the massive technological and educational base that supports American basic research and there are no incentives for industry to invest in basic science.

More narrowly, a shutdown at NIH means that new patients seeking cures will not be admitted to the clinical center. It means that program directors will not be able to talk to their grantees, that study sections reviewing grants will come to a grinding halt, and that most intramural scientists must put their work into hibernation. Stopping NIH in its tracks is more than inconvenient to scientists. It will delay discoveries. It will slow our already decelerating extramural research effort even faster in the United States. It will, most of all, send yet another clear signal to young investigators that science is not a priority in our country, but a political football that a capricious Congress can use for scoring political points. They should take their government-supported training and look elsewhere for careers.

My thoughts go out to all those dedicated and smart "feds" who work tirelessly in our science agencies. Even during the furlough, they will have to pay bills and take care of their kids. Do we run the risk of losing talented employees serving science and our country? I was touched when I heard Tom Südhof's reaction to the good news about winning the 2013 Lasker award. Not only did he thank his program director at NIH, who over the years helped fund his top-notch research, but Südhof invited this "bureaucrat" to be his personal guest at the flashy Lasker award ceremony in New York. A seat at the Laskers is a hot ticket but Südhof made it a priority to show that a federal employee deserved to be recognized for the essential role he played at NIH not just in government operations but in the making of the science that the Lasker honors. Basic science is an essential good and those who administer it deserve a few honors, not rubber paychecks.

This is only one of many examples that I could bring to "Activation Energy" readers. Our future depends on the discoveries and innovations that we make today. If science is closed for business today or tomorrow or next month, those lost days will not be ours to spend later. There will be delays, for example, in grasping the mechanisms that drive devastating diseases. But worse, there will be absences where there would have been critical insights and where there would have been a next generation of prize scientists. As I've said repeatedly, without research (or with slashed back sequestered research), we rob our future.

So if our democracy is running out of steam, will our basic science evaporate? Will we see our scientific competitiveness condensate again on another continent? I am not sure we want to run this experiment.

 

Stefano Bertuzzi

Dr. Stefano Bertuzzi is the Executive Director of the American Society for Cell Biology. In this position he is responsible, with the ASCB Board, for strategic planning and all operations at the Society to serve the needs of its ~9,000 members and to promote the field of cellular biology and basic science.

Email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Most Recent Articles *

To read the full article, click on the READ MORE button below.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Prev Next
ASCB Kaluza Prize Reflects ASCB’s Concern that Young Scientists Are Now a Vulnerable Population

ASCB Kaluza Prize Reflects ASCB’s Concern that Young Scientists Are Now a Vulnerable Population

The ASCB Kaluza Prize recognizes significant research achievement by early career scientists who still pursue excellence amidst economic uncertainties and political shortsightedness. ASCB Photo.In the...

11-20-2013

Read more
Round Trip from Stockholm to ASCB

Round Trip from Stockholm to ASCB

With Stockholm still in the future, Randy Schekman (third from left) with fellow 2013 Nobel winner, Jim Rothman (far right), shared the ASCB's highest scientific honor, the E. B. Wilson Medal, with St...

11-06-2013

Read more
Colliding Worlds—A Rare Visit to the CERN Collider Gives a Biologist New Hope

Colliding Worlds—A Rare Visit to the CERN Collider Gives a Biologist New Hope

Nearly 170 meters beneath CERN, ASCB Executive Director Stefano Bertuzzi gets a rare look at the Large Hadron Collider. Here he stands in front of the detector. Photo Credit: ASCBLast week, I was invi...

10-23-2013

Read more
Watching Train Wrecks

Watching Train Wrecks

It’s full steam ahead for disaster or will the brakes stop the runaway fiscal crisis train in time? Photo by John FleischmanAlong with the future of U.S. research science, the train wreck metaphor has...

10-16-2013

Read more
UPDATED-NIH Furloughs to Widen—From Slowdown to Shutdown, U.S. Science Takes a Hit

UPDATED-NIH Furloughs to Widen—From Slowdown to Shutdown, U.S. Science Takes a Hit

The USDA is closed and no U.S. orders for international fruit flies can be processed until the government is back in business.Photo Credit: André KarwathUUPDATED—The "Activation Energy" blog has learn...

10-09-2013

Read more
New Partners and New Ventures for ASCB in Science Education Reform

New Partners and New Ventures for ASCB in Science Education Reform

In a 2012 Science editorial, Bruce Alberts, a former ASCB president who was then the journal's editor, urged professional societies to team up in leading innovation in science education. ASC...

09-25-2013

Read more
The Scholarly Paper That No One Will Want to Read Is Being Written in Congress

The Scholarly Paper That No One Will Want to Read Is Being Written in Congress

Spelling It Out: Spending on basic research has increased our longevity and the quality of that longer life. Photo Credit: John FleischmanThis week, a paper in the American Journal of Public Health, a...

09-18-2013

Read more
A Scientist-Senator with a Seat — and a Vote — for Life

A Scientist-Senator with a Seat — and a Vote — for Life

I recently spent some time on a family vacation in Italy. We have a tradition in our family; at the dinner table, each of us has to say the best and the worst thing that happened to him or her during ...

09-10-2013

Read more
Showing the Faces of Science

Showing the Faces of Science

In 2011, the Nobel Foundation awarded its prize of prizes to cell biologist, immunologist, and longtime ASCB member Ralph Steinman. When the foundation tried calling to deliver the good news, no one p...

09-05-2013

Read more
Lessons from a Society of Societies

Lessons from a Society of Societies

This week, ASCB went to ASAE, or rather five ASCB staffers and yours truly attended a meeting of the ASAE in Atlanta. ASCB, I trust you know, stands for the American Society for Cell Biology. The ASAE...

08-07-2013

Read more
Why Congress Should Be Worried About the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Why Congress Should Be Worried About the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Morphogenesis in biology always fascinated me. As a developmental neurobiologist at the bench, I studied how homeobox genes patterned the neural epithelium, the retina in particular, to understand the...

07-30-2013

Read more
The Perils of Reviewing Peer Review

The Perils of Reviewing Peer Review

As a recovering federal employee, I recognize that one of the biggest challenges the government faces in funding science is that of being truly Darwinian in a rapidly evolving scientific environment. ...

07-24-2013

Read more